Unbiased History

In January 1992, the famous English Director Robert Watts, together with the American assistant, Laura Alexander visited Moscow to meet with A.T. Fomenko. The purpose of the visit was to create a film about the New Chronology.

Robert Watts known as a Director and producer of films Star Wars and Indiana Jones. He became interested in the ideas of New Chronology, opens great opportunities for the Director. Unfortunately, the project is not completed. This was filmed quite a lot of material, but he was not processed and assembled altogether..

In archive of A.T. Fomenko the only one left of the draft entries, which is offered to the attention of the audience.

Tatyana Yurina's movie, 2004. At that time very few people heard about New Chronology Fomenko-Nosovsky and therefore this movie is interesting, that expresses a look ignorant in the history of the person (the director of the movie), made for itself unexpected discovery - the official history is an invention

Scientific books and museum exhibition, historical novels and movies convince us that, on the The history of mankind is known almost all and on virtually any question fittings of reason from the Historians there is sure to be a ready answer to . If, however, we take a look at our past more closely, We find there many Frick and inconsistencies.

Why, for example, are usually attentive to Historical detail medieval sculpture depicted biblical and ancient Characters, such as their contemporaries?

How ancient soldiers could cut the enemies with bronze swords if bronze in those days yet was not? And whence the weapon from iron has undertaken in Ancient Egypt? And on what basis Ivan Groznyj named itself the lineal descendant of the Roman emperor of August?

Seemingly, these and many other puzzles were forcing historians to take a closer look at our past. But this has not yet happened, and so unwittingly the question arises: do we really know our history?

From ancient times to the present day the whole history of mankind is clearly dated. In many historical and archaeological references can be found the answer to virtually any question. The museums of the world are kept unique exhibits - witnesses of bygone eras. Among them, there is hardly ever alone on the plate which is written 'unknown origin' or 'age unknown'. All of these items are grouped and meticulously laid out in chronological order.

But there is no reason why scientists have come to the conclusion that, for example, It is this the jug applies to the fifth century before our era, and this is the eighth century is already our era? It is accepted that methods of determining the age of ancient objects are well tested, And, most importantly, very reliable. But whether this is the case? Whether the world history is based on strict scientific evidence?

The film is dedicated to the unique author's methods of dating historical events developed by the Russian scientist, academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences Anatoly Fomenko. Applying these methods, the scientists found that the written history of mankind are much shorter than the one we are studying in schools and universities. Checking for certain known events of 17th-20th century revealed the high accuracy of the new methods and the justification of their application for the reconstruction of the past.

Among the many monuments, left behind by ancient civilizations, of course, The most well-known are pyramids of ancient Egypt. It is considered that it has long been known, who, when, and why they are built. But so far there is no answer to the question: how? Many hypotheses, but any one of them contains a weak places.

Many hypotheses, but any one of them contains a weak places. Numerous attempts to researchers check theory practice completed failed. But even in the second half on 20 century engineers. Chemists have expertise mummy construction stone. Mystery of ancient pyramids was one! But this opening does not become a sensation. The scientific world responded to complete silence. Египтологи as though it did not notice the opening. And do not want to overlook his so far.